Hayhurst v. Ozalan

70 F.3d 1278 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald C. HAYHURST, NMD, Ph.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glen T. OZALAN, ND, Individually and as agent for the Arizona State Board of Naturopathic Examiners; Arizona State Board of Naturopathic Examiners; Douglas R. Norton, Individually and as agent for the State of Arizona Office of Auditor General; Arizona Officer of the Auditor General; American Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16181. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 24, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald C. Hayhurst appeals pro se the district court's (1) dismissal of his claims against the State of Arizona Office of the Auditor General ("Office") and the Arizona State Board of Naturopathic Examiners ("Board"); (2) summary judgment in favor of state officials Dr. Glen Ozalan and Doug Norton; and (3) the denial of his…