Donald Edward Larue Johnson, Jr. v. United States

70 F.3d 1279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald Edward Larue JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-36012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. * Decided Dec. 4, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald Edward LaRue Johnson, Jr., appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his amended complaint seeking damages and an apology from the United States for human rights violations against African slaves and their descendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Based on the opinion in Cato v. United States, Nos. 94-17102, 94-17104, slip op. 15157 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 1995), which we are filing together with this disposition, we affirm. 3 The district court's designation of a magistrate judge to submit proposed findings and recommendations does not violate Article III or the separation…