Gwendolyn Rowe-Lee v. Regents of Univ Cal, Gwendolyn Rowe-Lee v. Regents of Univ Cal, Gwendolyn Rowe-Lee v. Regents of Univ Cal

70 F.3d 1279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gwendolyn ROWE-LEE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REGENTS OF UNIV CAL, Defendant-Appellant. Gwendolyn ROWE-LEE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REGENTS OF UNIV CAL, Defendant-Appellant. Gwendolyn ROWE-LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENTS OF UNIV CAL, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-16774, 94-15635 and 94-15777. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 1995. Decided Nov. 24, 1995. Before: HALL, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court erred by empaneling a jury in this case. By the time of trial, all of plaintiff's claims against all of the defendants had been dismissed with prejudice, except one claim against one defendant--plaintiff's Title VII claim against the Regents. Plaintiff wasn't entitled to a jury trial on this claim, because it arose before the effective date of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub.L. No. 102-166, 1991 U.S.S.C.A.N. (105 Stat.) 1071. Under…