Sergio Jaramillo-Gonzalez Adoracion Jaramillo-Sito Kathryn Sue Jaramillo-Sito Karlo Sergio Jaramillo-Sito v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
70 F.3d 1279·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39411
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199594-70860California976 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 1279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sergio JARAMILLO-GONZALEZ; Adoracion Jaramillo-Sito; Kathryn Sue Jaramillo-Sito; Karlo Sergio Jaramillo-Sito, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70860. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 22, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sergio Jaramillo-Gonzalez ("Jaramillo"), Adoracion Jaramillo-Sito, and their two minor children, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the order of an immigration judge ("IJ"), denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1158 (a) and 1253(h). After a de novo review of the record, the BIA determined that Jaramillo's past harm and future fears were not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.