Hubert L. Passmore v. National Trust and Saving Assoc. The Bank of America

70 F.3d 1279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hubert L. PASSMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVING ASSOC.; The Bank of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 24, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hubert L. Passmore appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to vacate an arbitration decision on the basis of fraud and impartiality. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 1 and affirm. 3 Passmore filed this diversity suit against defendant Bank of America, as successor in interest to Security Pacific National Bank, alleging that because of a false representation by a bank teller, and a mechanical error at an ATM machine, he overdrew on his checking account by $200. The bank reported the overdraft to ChexSystems, a national network for account verification, and as a result,…