United States v. Ronald Gobert

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald GOBERT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50153. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 24, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Gobert appeals his 175-month sentence following resentencing by the district court. Gobert contends that the district court erred by improperly calculating his sentence in compliance with this court's remand order and that the district judge should recuse herself from resentencing on remand. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines, United States v. Oliver, 60 F.2d 547, 554 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. 3 The Sentencing Guidelines provide a scheme for sentencing defendants to multiple counts. "Under this scheme, the sentencing court is…