United States v. William Bruno Chappie

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Bruno CHAPPIE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50314. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 13, 1995. * Decided Nov. 24, 1995. 1 Before: HALL and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges, and SHUBB, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 William Bruno Chappie appeals from the order of the district court revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Appellant raises two issues. First, he challenges the district court's jurisdiction, and second, he argues that the revocation was improper because his probation officer breached an agreement not to recommend revocation. The first argument has no merit, and appellant waived the second by not raising it before the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. 4 The jurisdiction of the district court to revoke a supervised release is an issue of law reviewed de novo.…