United States v. David Beland

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BELAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-55154. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 24, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner David Beland appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. He contends that statements and evidence should have been suppressed due to violations of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and counsel was ineffective both before Beland's guilty plea and at sentencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2255. 1 We review the denial of a Sec. 2255 motion de novo, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Beland failed to raise the following contentions in his Sec. 2255 motion in the district court: (1) statements and evidence must be suppressed due to…