Securities and Exchange Commission v. Osborne, Stern & Company, and Douglas Wayne Osborne

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OSBORNE, STERN & COMPANY, Defendant, and Douglas Wayne OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-55997. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. * Decided Nov. 22, 1995. 1 Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and JONES, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Douglas W. Osborne ("Osborne") appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief from a default judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We affirm. 4 Osborne's main contention is that the district court's entry of default judgment was too harsh a sanction and its decision not to set aside that default judgment was unreasonable. Osborne filed his notice of appeal on June 24, 1995. Because the district court's entry of default and default judgment both antedated Osborne's notice of appeal by more than 60 days, Osborne's appeal can only challenge the…