Stanislaw v. Navajo County Bd. of Sup'rs

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger STANISLAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAVAJO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; Larry Layton, Chairman, Navajo County Board of Supervisors; Percy Deal, Member of the Navajo Board of Supervisors, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Oct. 16, 1995. * Decided: Nov. 15, 1995. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roger Stanislaw brought a pro se 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the Navajo County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Gary Butler, Deputy Sheriff Kelly Clark, the Navajo County Board of Supervisors (collectively "County defendants"), and his neighbor, Rocky Nelson. He appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants. Stanislaw also appeals the district court's denial of additional time for discovery. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Jesinger v. Nevada…