United States v. Leonardo Bennett

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonardo BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56582. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Dec. 1, 1995. Before: BOOCHEVER, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Bennett appeals the denial of his section 2255 motion. We review de novo. Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778 (9th Cir.1994). 3 Bennett challenges sufficiency of the evidence. We are required to view all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, United States v. Spetz, 721 F.2d 1457 (9th Cir.1983), assuming that the trier of fact resolved disputes in favor of the government's evidence. United States v. Garza, 980 F.2d 546, 552 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm if any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Shortt Accountancy Corp., 785 F.2d 1448 (9th…