United States v. Ronald Gordon

Good Law
70 F.3d 1280·1995 WL 696570·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 199594-50155California950 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 1280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald GORDON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 24, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Gordon appeals pro se his conviction and sentence imposed following his guilty plea to making a false statement to a government agency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001 . Gordon contends that his guilty plea was not voluntary, that the government breached the plea agreement, that his sentence violates the plea agreement, and that his counsel was ineffective. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 3 Gordon contends that his guilty plea was not voluntary because the district court gave him a longer sentence of probation than the one he was advised of at his plea hearing. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.