United States v. Aldo Ramos, United States of America v. Fidencio Ramos, Jr., Aka: Fidencio Ramos

Good Law
70 F.3d 1281·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 199594-50564California614 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aldo RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidencio RAMOS, Jr., aka: Fidencio Ramos, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-50564, 94-50617. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1995. * Decided Nov. 17, 1995. Before: FARRIS, BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Aldo Ramos appeals the district court's calculation of his sentence following a guilty plea to one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and two counts of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Fidencio Ramos, Jr., Aldo's brother and co-defendant, entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Fidencio appeals the district court's denial of his request for an evidentiary hearing pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.