United States v. Byron Khan Roberts

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Byron Khan ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30333. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 22, 1995. 1 Before: CHOY, SNEED, and FERGUSON Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Byron Khan Roberts appeals his conviction of two counts of falsifying firearms records, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(B), and two counts of felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (g) and 924(a)(2). Roberts argues that the district court erred: (1) in denying his motion for a new trial because the government failed to disclose material exculpatory evidence until after trial; and (2) in admitting expert testimony from an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. We affirm. I. 4 Roberts contends that the Government's failure to disclose material exculpatory evidence prior to trial…