Mary Vaefaga v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mary VAEFAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee No. 94-35705. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. Decided Nov. 17, 1995. Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Mary Vaefaga brought an action against her former employer, Oregon Steel Mills (OSM), for violations of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000 (e), O.R.S. Sec. 659.030, common law wrongful discharge, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted OSM's motion for summary judgment, alleging that Vaefaga was precluded from bringing the action because she had previously entered into a settlement with OSM. We affirm. I. O.R.S. Sec. 657.300 3 Vaefaga contends that the provisions of the settlement agreement require that OSM withhold material facts from the Employment Division.…