Walker v. City of Oakland

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Norris WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, Oakland Police Department, J. Pertoso, P. Heiser, Sgt. Politzer, Chief George Hart, Sgt. Arthur Roth, Sgt. Brian Thiem, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Sept. 27, 1995. * Decided: Nov. 15, 1995. Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Norris Walker, a Mississippi state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants. Walker, in his Amended Complaint, alleged that, in connection with his arrest on April 3, 1989, the defendant officers, members of the Oakland, California Police Department, violated his 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1995). We affirm the judgment of the district court. I. FACTS DERIVED FROM STATEMENTS OF…