United States v. Daryl Lynn Hooper

Good Law
70 F.3d 1281·1995 WL 688183·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39333
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 199594-50381California698 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daryl Lynn HOOPER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. * Decided Nov. 17, 1995. Before: FARRIS, BRUNETTI, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daryl Lynn Hooper appeals the ninety-seven month prison sentence imposed by the district court. He pled guilty to conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 , to distribute in excess of 100 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Appellant was involved in a conspiracy that traded methamphetamine for ephedrine. He alleges that the district court erred in applying U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1, instead of U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.11. He timely appeals. 3 The district court's interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines are reviewed de novo. United States v. Buenrostro-Torres, 24 F.3d 1173, 1174 (9th Cir.1994). This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.