United States v. Dennis Shoulderblade

Good Law
70 F.3d 1281·1995 WL 681552·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39339
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 199595-30067California559 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis SHOULDERBLADE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30067. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Oct. 17, 1995. Decided: Nov. 14, 1995. 1 Before: REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant appeals from a final judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a sentence of imprisonment on the grounds: (1) that the district court erred in admitting the results of seven positive urinalysis tests in violation of defendant's constitutional right to confront witnesses against him; and (2) that the district court's application of Sec. 7B1.4 of the Sentencing Guidelines violated the ex post facto clause. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 (a) and affirm. 4 On May 17, 1990, defendant Dennis Shoulderblade was indicted for possessing a weapon as a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.