United States v. Sax James Snith, AKA Sax James Sundara

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sax James SNITH, aka Sax James Sundara, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. * Decided Nov. 21, 1995. Before: FARRIS, BRUNETTI, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sax James Snith appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 to possess counterfeited and forged securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 513 (a). We have jurisdiction over the timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm his sentence. I. CALCULATION OF OFFENSE LEVEL 3 Snith argues that the district court erred in determining his offense level because it was ambiguous as to the specific Sentencing Guideline that it was applying. More specifically, Snith contends that the district court failed to make clear whether it was…