United States v. Joe Ricardo Renteria

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe Ricardo RENTERIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56034. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. * Decided Dec. 5, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges and TANNER, ** District Court Judge 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Joe Ricardo Renteria appeals from the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal and affirm in part and remand Renteria's forfeiture double jeopardy claim for ruling by the district court. 4 We review de novo a district court's denial of a 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451 (9th Cir.1995). 5 1. Claims Raised for the First Time on Appeal. 6 Pro se pleadings are held "to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers", Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) and are liberally construed.…