Wilkins v. Oxford Chemicals, Inc.

70 F.3d 1281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William E. WILKINS, Jr. and Michael Lombardo, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. OXFORD CHEMICALS, INC., a corporation; Dubois USA, a Division of Diversey Corporation; Diversey Corp, a corporation; Diversey USA Holdings Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15418. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. Decided Dec. 1, 1995. 1 Before: PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiffs-Appellants William E. Wilkins, Jr. and Michael Lombardo appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Oxford Chemicals Inc., Dubois USA, Diversey Corp., and Diversey USA Holdings, Inc. (collectively, "Oxford"). Wilkins and Lombardo sued Oxford for negligence and strict product liability for respiratory injuries they allegedly suffered after cleaning up a spill of a chemical manufactured and sold by…