Blyler

Blyler v. Hemmeter (In re Hemmeter)

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 3009·242 F.3d 1186·25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2590·37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 172·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2366
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 2001No. 99-55777California1,936 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether ERISA plan fiduciaries are also fiduciaries within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(4). We conclude that they are, but that the specific allegations of breach of ERISA fiduciary duties do not constitute defalcations within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(4).

I

Morrison Knudsen Corporation (“MK”) was a large, publicly-held, engineering and construction company headquartered in Boise, Idaho. After an economic downturn, it filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in 1996 and was ultimately acquired by Washington Construction Group, Inc., under a confirmed reorganization plan. After the termination of its defined benefits pension plan in 1987, MK established two pension plans for the benefit of its employees: the Morrison Knudsen Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP Plan”) and the Morrison Knudsen Corporation Savings Plan (“401K Plan”).

The MK Board of Directors, of which resort developer Christopher Hemmeter was a member, and an Administrative Committee comprised of no fewer than three MK employees were the named fiduciaries of the ESOP plan. Mellon Bank, N.A., was the trustee of the ESOP plan assets during the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.