Castillo-Rivera

United States v. Castillo-Rivera

Bad Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 3011·244 F.3d 1020·2001 WL 287046·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2382·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4584
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 2001No. 00-50046California2,149 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tashima, J.

Jose de Jesus Castillo-Rivera (“Castillo”), a Mexican citizen who pled guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § .1326, appeals the sentence enhancement for removal subsequent to conviction for an aggravated felony. Castillo contends that his prior state conviction for violating California Penal Code (“CPC”) § 12021(a) as a felon in possession of a firearm does not constitute an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(E), because it is not “an offense described in” 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), the federal felon in possession statute. The state crime, unlike § 922(g), does not include any interstate or foreign commerce element. Castillo also raises for the first time on appeal a challenge to his sentence under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), on the ground that his prior conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), and we affirm.

I. Background

Castillo pled guilty to a single-count indictment charging him as an alien unlawfully found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.