95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9034, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,866 Martin Stivers Mary Chase Ernsberger Chamar, Inc. v. Richard Pierce George D. Wendell Denise Conrad Gary T. Robey Brian McKay Carol Widmer-Hanna Robert J. Rodefer Bill Bertram Individually and as Members of the Nevada State Private Investigators Licensing Board the Nevada State Private Investigators Licensing Board and Does 1-10

Good Law
71 F.3d 732
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199594-15966California12,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

71 F.3d 732 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9034 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,866 Martin STIVERS; Mary Chase Ernsberger; Chamar, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard PIERCE; George D. Wendell; Denise Conrad; Gary T. Robey; Brian McKay; Carol Widmer-Hanna; Robert J. Rodefer; Bill Bertram; individually and as members of the Nevada State Private Investigators Licensing Board; The Nevada State Private Investigators Licensing Board; and Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-16756, 94-15966. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 16, 1995. Decided Dec. 1, 1995. Terri Keyser-Cooper, Reno, Nevada, for the plaintiffs-appellants. P. Mark Ghan, Assistant Attorney General, Carson City, Nevada, for the defendants-appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before: FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge NOONAN. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: 1 This action arises out of decisions by the Nevada State Private Investigators Licensing Board ("the Board"), denying the plaintiffs' applications for licenses in the fields of private investigation, private…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.