Shaw

ORDER

We remand to the district court to determine in light of the opinion in Shaw v. Murphy, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1475 , 149 L.Ed.2d 420 (2001), whether the prison regulations — particularly the rules forbidding insolence and interference with due process hearings — as applied to Murphy in this case are “reasonably related to legiti *1152 mate penological interests” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 79 , 107 S.Ct. 2254 , 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987), or vague and overboard as applied to him.