Zimmerman

Zimmerman v. City of Oakland

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 6359·255 F.3d 734·2001 WL 693910·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5114·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13789
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2001No. 99-16828California2,615 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Ronald Zimmerman, Steffi Zimmerman, Jim Hines, and the Jim Hines Foundation (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their complaint against the City of Oakland and various individuals employed by the city (collectively, “Defendants”). We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.

I

According to the complaint, the Zimmer-mans own property in Oakland that is zoned for light industrial use. The dispute in this case revolves around a reconditioned transit bus stored on that property for the use of the Jim Hines Foundation, a non-profit organization whose office is also located on the property. On March 27, 1998, Sergeant Leonard White and other Oakland police officers entered the property to search for derelict vehicles. The officers tagged several vehicles, including the bus, and mailed the Zimmermans a notice stating that the city considered the vehicles public nuisances and would seize them in ten days.

Following instructions provided in the notice, Mr. Zimmerman requested a pre-seizure hearing, which was scheduled to occur at the Zimmerman property on April 23, 1998. On that date, Sergeant White arrived and announced that he would be the hearing officer.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.