Guerrero v. Board of Educ. of Emery United School Dist.

Good Law
72 F.3d 135·1995 WL 732648·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40701
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 199594-16415California655 words

Opinion

Opinion

72 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlos GUERRERO, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the EMERY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT; Ronald Mooney; Cheryl Bolling; Barbara Kryzwicki, Defendants-Appellees. Kate Dixon, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant. No. 94-16415. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 5, 1995. * Decided Dec. 8, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dixon appeals the district court's order requiring her to withdraw from the present case and all related cases, and suspending Dixon from practicing law in certain types of cases before the district court for the Northern District of California for a period of two years. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse and remand. 3 Respondents argue that this appeal is moot because the district court's order pertained to nine other related cases from which Dixon does not appeal. This argument lacks merit. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.