Felipe Flores v. Melvin Coley, Melvin Ray, Robert Remillard, Monika Villegas, County of Tulare

72 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Felipe FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melvin COLEY, Melvin Ray, Robert Remillard, Monika Villegas, County of Tulare, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 1995. Decided Dec. 8, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Felipe Flores ("Flores") appeals from the judgment entered, following a jury trial, in favor of the County of Tulare ("County") in Flores's action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-2 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 and Cal.Gov't Code Sec. 12940 et. seq. Flores's claims are based on his contention that he was discriminated against on the basis of gender and national origin while employed at the Tulare County Correctional Center ("TCCC"). Flores claims that the district court erred in: (1) dismissing his section 1981 claim for failure to comply with the applicable…