Brasseur v. Empire Travel Service, Inc.

Good Law
72 F.3d 135·1995 WL 746181·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40687
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 199594-15905California1,833 words

Opinion

Opinion

72 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Chris BRASSEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPIRE TRAVEL SERVICE, INC.; Empire Tours Incorp., a corporation; GIZELLE FRIEDMAN, Individually and dba Empire Tours, Compania Mexicana de Aviacion, S.A., a foreign corporation, companies 1 through 25 and Does 1 through 100, inclusive; Compania Mexicana de Aviacion, S.A., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15905. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. Decided Dec. 15, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Chris Brasseur appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Compania Mexicana de Aviacion ("Mexicana"), Empire Travel Service, Inc. and Empire Tours (jointly "Empire Travel"). Brasseur contends that: (1) the district court erred in applying an "ordinary" standard of care to Mexicana's conduct; (2) the district court's findings were unsupported by the evidence; (3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.