Jose Ramirez-Caro v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
72 F.3d 135·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40706
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199594-70263California233 words

Opinion

Opinion

72 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose RAMIREZ-CARO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. * Decided Dec. 6, 1995. Before: HALL, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and PRO, District Judge. ** ORDER *** The Court having considered the supplemental letter briefs filed by the parties on November 17, 1995, and it appearing therefrom that the parties agree that this matter should be remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals as a result of this Court's holding in de Robles v. INS, 58 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir.1995), IT IS ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for consideration of relief pursuant to 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). REMANDED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4 ** The Honorable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.