Alfredo Duenas-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

72 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfredo DUENAS-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70145. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. * Decided Dec. 6, 1995. 1 Before: HALL, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and PRO, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Alfredo Duenas-Lopez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") final order of deportation rendered on March 4, 1994. Duenas-Lopez contends that the Immigration Judge ("IJ") erred in denying his motion for a continuance, refusing to admit evidence regarding the nature and circumstances of his arrest which led to his conviction, and declining to address his eligibility for relief under Sec. 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, codified at 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a, and we deny the petition. I. Request for Continuance 4 Duenas-Lopez asserts that the BIA erred in…