United States v. Dino Bradley

72 F.3d 136 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dino BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50655. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. Decided Dec. 7, 1995. 1 Before: HALL and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and SHUBB, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Dino R. Bradley appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial upon the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. FACTS 4 This case arises out of the robbery of the Hillcrest Station United States Post Office on September 29, 1993, in Inglewood, California. The fact that the robbery occurred was not disputed at trial. The question for the jury was whether Bradley organized and participated in the offense. 5 At trial the government introduced evidence that Bradley planned and orchestrated the armed robbery. The evidence (1) linked…