United States v. Patricia Ruth Robinson, United States of America v. Gale Jean McBroom United States of America v. John Charles Quigley, United States of America v. Malvin Eugene Robinson

Good Law
72 F.3d 136·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40672
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 199595-10089California1,355 words

Opinion

Opinion

72 F.3d 136 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia Ruth ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gale Jean McBROOM, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Charles QUIGLEY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malvin Eugene ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10087 to 95-10089 and 95-10099. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1995. * Decided Dec. 13, 1995. Before: BROWNING, CANBY, and HALL Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Malvin Eugene Robinson, Patricia Ruth Robinson, John Charles Quigley and Gale Jean McBroom appeal from orders denying their motion to dismiss the indictment and their motion for reconsideration, in which they requested an evidentiary hearing. Appellants allege state and federal authorities colluded with one another in violation of the dual sovereignty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.