United States v. Gabriel Carrasco-Ramos
Opinion
Opinion
72 F.3d 136 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel CARRASCO-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10109. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1995. * Decided Dec. 6, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gabriel Carrasco-Ramos appeals his convictions for (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 ; and (2) possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and aiding and abetting in the possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 . We have jurisdiction over the timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm his conviction. 3 Appellant objects to two passages of testimony by Jose Maria Sadano. Sadano was also charged in the indictment and entered a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement. 4 A district court's…