Jeffers

Jeffers v. Gomez

Bad Law
267 F.3d 895·2000 WL 33535714
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 2001Nos. 99-15867, 99-15870, 99-15868, 99-15869California9,471 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed on February 20, 2001, and appearing at 240 F.3d 845 , is amended in accordance with the attached amended opinion.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Kozinski and Graber have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Aldisert has so recommended.

*900 The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

OPINION

These appeals by California correctional officers, a former prison warden and the former state Director of the Department of Corrections from the denial by the district court of their motions for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity require us to decide whether emergency responses and prison security measures, undertaken to control a large-scale disturbance in a prison yard, constituted Eighth Amendment violations under circumstances in which Appellee Donnell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.