In Re Audrey E. Noblit, Debtor. James Fox, Successor Trustee v. Arlan Smoker, Husband and Donna Smoker, Wife

Good Law
72 F.3d 757·95 Daily Journal DAR 16841·1995 WL 750389·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35932·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9700
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199594-16062California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

Norris, J.

Opinion by Judge NORRIS.

This appeal presents the threshold question whether a creditor has standing to assert the exempt status of a preferentially transferred property as a defense against avoidance. This is a question of law we review de novo. Kupetz v. United States (In re California Trade Technical Sch., Inc.), 923 F.2d 641, 645 (9th Cir.1991).

I

On May 16, 1990, debtor Audrey Noblit filed a homestead exemption for her residence pursuant to Arizona law, and recorded the exemption with the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office. Sometime after May 16, 1990, Noblit sold her residence and deposited the proceeds ($17,858.41) into a bank account. On June 25, 1990, Noblit paid appellants Arlan and Donna Smoker $11,500 of the proceeds to satisfy a debt she owed them. On July 31, 1990, Noblit filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. She claimed the remaining balance in the bank account ($800) as exempt property. The Chapter 7 trustee did not file any objection to Noblit’s claim of exemption.

On March 4, 1992, the trustee filed a complaint to avoid Noblit’s preferential transfer to the Smokers. The bankruptcy court granted summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.