UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gene CAMP, Victor Camp, Todd Oatman, Defendants-Appellants

Good Law
72 F.3d 759·95 Daily Journal DAR 17019·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36328·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9769
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 199594-30292, 94-30303 and 94-30304California1,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

ORDER

The petitions for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en bane are denied as moot. The amended opinion filed October 3, 1995 has been withdrawn and the memorandum disposition filed June 29, 1995 is hereby amended. A new opinion will be filed simultaneously with this order, together with an amended memorandum disposition.

OPINION

We decide whether at sentencing a federal court may consider information revealed by a defendant in exchange for state transactional immunity. We hold that it may and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In a prior state matter, the Missoula County Attorney in 1990 granted Gene and Victor Camp transactional immunity for all offenses related to the death of Peter Solberg. In return, Gene led police to Solberg’s body. He said Victor accidentally shot Solberg while the three were hunting together, and that they kept the death a secret because of an unrelated outstanding warrant for Gene’s arrest. The State Medical Examiner found the trajectory of the bullet to be inconsistent with an accidental gunshot. The police officer who investigated Solberg’s death suggested that it was most likely that Victor lured him into the brush and Gene intentionally shot him in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.