Deroche

Deroche v. Arizona Industrial Commission

Good Law
272 F.3d 1289·2001 WL 1513236
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 2001No. 99-16058California2,437 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fletcher, J.

The Bankruptcy Code provides that “an excise tax on ... a transaction occurring during the three years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the [bankruptcy] petition” is not dischargeable in bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. § 507 ^®®©. 1 *1291 also 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(1)(A). In this case, an employer failed to carry workers’ compensation insurance, and an injured employee was compensated directly from a “Special Fund” maintained by the Industrial Commission of Arizona (“Commission”). Under Arizona law, an employer who has failed to carry insurance is required to reimburse the Special Fund for compensation paid to an injured employee, plus penalties and interest.

We have previously held that reimbursement of the Special Fund is an “excise tax” within the meaning of § 507(a)(8)(E)(ii). See (In re Camilli), Industrial Comm’n of Ariz. v. Camilli, 94 F.3d 1330, 1333-34 (9th Cir.1996). In this ease, we are asked to decide the date of the “transaction” on which this excise tax is based in order to determine the three-year period of non-dischargeability. We hold that a “transaction” is the act of employing a worker without carrying the required insurance when the worker is injured. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.