Zinser
Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.
2001 Daily Journal DAR 12963·273 F.3d 1266·2001 WL 1591131·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10393·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26570
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 2001No. 99-17073California122 words
Lead Opinion
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge B. FLETCHER.
ORDER
The majority opinion filed June 15, 2001, is amended as follows:
Judges O’Scannlain and Gould have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Fletcher has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.