Anderson

Anderson v. Davis

Good Law
279 F.3d 674
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 2002No. 01-70109California819 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

Stephen Wayne Anderson (“Anderson”) stands convicted of murder and sentenced to death. See Anderson v. Calderon, 232 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 580 , 151 L.Ed.2d 451 (2001). His execution is currently scheduled to occur on January 29, 2002, at 12:01 AM. He has exhausted his appeals and opportunities for collateral review and now seeks a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction against his execution by the State of California. The ground he advances is that the Governor of California, Gray Davis, allegedly has a blanket policy vis á vis murderers to deny all applications of executive clemency out-of-hand without exercising any judgment on the particular case or prisoner before him. This policy, asserts Anderson, violates both the Eighth and the Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and denies to him the due process to which he is entitled under law. The legal authority for his case rests largely on language from Justice O’Con-nor’s opinion in Ohio Adult Parole Auth. v. Woodard, 523 U.S. 272, 289 , 118 S.Ct. 1244 , 140 L.Ed.2d 387 (1998) (O’Connor, J., concurring):

Anderson’s tactical objective in this action is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.