Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner

Good Law
279 F.3d 767
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 2002No. 99-70805California2,935 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McKeown, J.

This case requires us to consider whether the Tax Court detailed its reasoning *769 with the requisite specificity dictated by Leonard Pipeline Contractors v. Comm’r, 142 F.3d 1138 , 1135-36 (9th Cir.1998). The Estate of Emanuel Trompeter and Trompeter’s daughters, who are co-executors of the estate (collectively, the “Estate”), appeal from a Tax Court decision partially upholding a multi-million dollar deficiency determination by the Internal Revenue Service and imposing a 75 percent penalty for fraud. Because the Tax Court did not articulate sufficiently the basis for its ruling on omitted assets and its rationale with respect to the valuation of certain stock, we vacate the Tax Court’s decision and remand for further proceedings.

Background

Emanuel Trompeter, a wealthy entrepreneur who resided in Southern California, died on March 18, 1992, at the age of 73. His only surviving children, Robin Carol Trompeter Gonzalez and Janet llene Trompeter Polachek, are the Estate’s co-executors and its only beneficiaries.

Trompeter earned much of his wealth during his tenure as proprietor of Trom-peter Electronics, Inc. (“TEI”), a privately-held entity that he and his former wife, Sylvia…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.