United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1838·279 F.3d 1189·2002 WL 220948·32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20475·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1481
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 2002Nos. 00-15688, 00-15690 and 00-15692California7,730 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tashima, J.

In the mid-1980s, a number of landowners in the Newlands Reclamation Project (Project) in Nevada submitted applications to transfer water rights between different parcels of property. The Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians (Tribe) protested the applications under the Nevada law of forfeiture and abandonment, arguing that the transfers would decrease the water flow into Pyramid Lake, which is situated on the Tribe’s aboriginal homeland. The Nevada State Engineer (Engineer) initially granted the transfer applications and the Tribe, joined by the United States, appealed. On two separate occasions, the district court affirmed the Engineer’s rulings and this Court reversed and remanded. After the most recent remand, the Engineer made a series of rulings on forfeiture and abandonment that related specifically to the transfer applications of appellees in this case. The Tribe and the United States again appealed. The district court reversed in part and the Engineer issued a supplemental ruling on remand, which largely granted the transfer applications. The district court affirmed and this appeal ensued. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.