Util. L. Rep. P 14,081, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 129, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 201 Overton Power District No. 5, Valley Electric Association, Inc. v. Hazel R. O'leary, William H. White, Christine Ervin, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Power Authority, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

Good Law
73 F.3d 253
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 199693-17233California2,767 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 253 Util. L. Rep. P 14,081 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 129 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 201 OVERTON POWER DISTRICT NO. 5, Valley Electric Association, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hazel R. O'LEARY, William H. White, Christine Ervin, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Defendants-Appellees, Arizona Power Authority, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 93-17233. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Feb. 13, 1995. Submission Deferred Feb. 15, 1995. Resubmitted Dec. 11, 1995. Decided Jan. 4, 1996. James T. McManus and Arnold B. Podgorsky, Wright & Talisman, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellants. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, and Dennis D. Linder, Robert B. Greenspan and C. Max Vassanelli, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. Donald R. Allen, Duncan & Allen, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Colorado River Energy Distributors Association. Bryant C. Danner and Christa Piantadosi, Rosemead, California, for amicus curiae Southern California Edison Company. Northcutt Ely, Redlands, California, for amici curiae Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Southern California Edison Company. James P. Bartlett,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.