In Re Conner

Good Law
73 F.3d 258·96 Daily Journal DAR 417·19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2481·35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 256·77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 460
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 199694-16001California1,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 258 77 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -460, 64 USLW 2511 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,750, 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2481 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 270 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 417 , Pens. Plan Guide P 23916U In re Wilker S. & Janice M. CONNER, Debtor. John BARKLEY, Trustee, Appellant, v. Wilker S. CONNER; Janice M. Conner; Orthopedic Clinic 401K Profit Sharing Plan and Trust Agreement; Puregro Company, Appellees. No. 94-16001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. * Decided Jan. 11, 1996. Michael McGrath, Mesch, Clark & Rothschild, Tucson, Arizona, for appellant. Ellen M. Van Riper, Kane Jorden von Oppenfeld Bischoff & Biskind, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for appellees Wilker S. and Janice M. Conner. Wendy D. Woodrow, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, Phoenix, Arizona, for appellee Orthopedic Clinic 401K Profit Sharing Plan and Trust Agreement. April Pearson, Puregro/Unocal, Brea, California, for appellee Puregro Company. Appeal from a Decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, ** District Judge. SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellant is a Chapter 7 trustee of the estate of the debtors, Wilker…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.