Connell

ORDER

The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge of the court has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Fed. RApp. P. 35(b). The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

The opinion filed January 24, 2002, is hereby AMENDED as follows:

“While spelling out that the systemic and structural provisions of Title IV-D do not give rise to rights enforceable under § 1983, Blessing did ‘not foreclose the possibility that some provisions of Title IV-D give rise to individual rights,’ and remanded for the District Court to construe the complaint to determine whether ‘any specific claim asserts an individual federal right.’ Id. at 345-346, 117 S.Ct. 1353 .”