Patenaude

Patenaude v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Good Law
290 F.3d 1020·2002 WL 979747
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 2002No. 00-56913California3,820 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether tax-deferred variable annuities are covered securities under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”), Pub.L. No. 105-353, 112 Stat. 3227 (codified in scattered sections of 15 U.S.C.). We conclude that they are, and affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

Raymond Patenaude sought advice concerning the creation of a retirement plan for his new business from an agent of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (“Equitable Life”). According to his complaint, Patenaude was advised to establish a simplified employee pension (“SEP”) 2 plan with Equitable Life and to fund it with a variable annuity because of the tax benefits that such an arrangement would provide. Relying on the agent’s experience and expertise as a financial planner as well as Equitable’s reputation as a well-respected company, Patenaude set up a SEP plan and funded it with a variable annuity. Equitable solicited additional investments from Pate-naude by emphasizing the tax benefits of its variable annuity.

After contributing to his SEP for several years, Patenaude sought to transfer his retirement savings from Equitable Life…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.