Paige

Paige v. California

Good Law
291 F.3d 1141·2 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4730
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 2002No. 01-55312California4,360 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

This case has a long and difficult history. The allegations are serious; the plaintiffs, highway patrol officers who are members of racial minorities, allege that their employer, the California- Highway Patrol (“CHP”), maintains a promotional process that discriminates against them on the basis of race. The district court and this court have struggled with the issues involved, both because of the nature and importance of the allegations, and the complex legal and factual issues involved in racial discrimination cases.

In 1994, Jeff D. Paige, a black CHP lieutenant, brought this class action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of all current and future non-white CHP officers. He alleged that the promotional process of the CHP has a discriminatory impact on non-white officers in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. After a lengthy discovery period and a great number of submissions, the district court found that the CHP’s promotional process resulted in a disparate impact on the plaintiff class and, accordingly, granted partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs. The CHP appealed, and we reversed and remanded for further factual findings. See Paige v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.