Davis v. Stone

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sterling DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P.W. STONE, Secretary, Department of the Army; Paul E. Menoher, USAISC; Peter A. Kind; Alonzo E. Short; T.D. Rodgers; John A. Hedrick; John M. Watkins, Jr.; William V. Graves; Arthur M. Askew, III; Preston W. Holtry; Roy G. Lawrence; Harry S. Stacy; Charles A. Hoehn; Lawrence E. Cork; George Allen; Laverne Jenkins; Richard Sroka; Kathy Evans; Delio G. Colonna; George W. Reyes, USAISC; Williams W. Haines, USACARA-WE; William S. Stronjny, USACARA-WE; Robert L. Noiseau, EEOC-PDO, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16842. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Former federal employee Sterling Davis appeals pro se the district court's orders: (1) dismissing his action against the Secretary of the Army and others alleging that he was improperly terminated…