Hallett

Hallett v. Morgan

Good Law
296 F.3d 732·2002 WL 1560782
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 2002No. 00-35098California7,080 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Graber, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed April 26, 2002, is amended ás follows:

On slip opinion page 6360 [ 287 F.3d 1193 , 1212], delete:

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

OPINION

Plaintiffs, who are a class of prisoners at the Washington Corrections Center for Women (the Prison), brought this action in 1993 to challenge conditions of their confinement. Defendants, who are current and former prison officials, entered into a consent decree with Plaintiffs governing the quality and availability of medical, dental, and mental health services at the Prison. Under the terms of the parties’ agreement, the decree was to expire on January 12, 1999, unless timely extended. In 1998, Plaintiffs moved to extend jurisdiction over the consent decree for an additional period of time. Plaintiffs also moved, twice, to have Defendants held in contempt for past violations of the consent decree and moved to compel discovery. The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.