Flemming v. Oregon Parole Bd.

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerrold S. FLEMMING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD; Marva Claudette Fabien, Oregon Parole Board; Vern L. Faatz, Oregon Parole Board; Mike Pacheco, Oregon Parole Board; Daniel Santos, Oregon Parole Board; Diane Middleto, Oregon Parole Board; Levernis Coleman, Oregon Parole Board; Robert Scheidler, Superintendent Santiam Correctional Institution; Robert Stuckey, Ph D; Robert William Davis, Ph D, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-36207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerrold S. Flemming, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's section 1915(d) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action alleging that members of the Oregon Parole Board, two psychologists and a prison official (the "defendants") violated Flemming's due process and equal…